Comments on: Sex Education in the Philippines

By: jeLy

jeLy — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:44:45 +0000

I have a debate regarding on Sex Ed too..
As i read comments
it is more on Pros.
I need some information about it’s cons..
Please help me. .

By: Len

Len — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:34:26 +0000

im taking the pro side to sex education. sex is good. i am a mom already, and for me, it would be much better for my child to learn about sex in a more formal setting which is to be done in school. let’s not be hypocrites and face the fact that most families would not discuss this matter openly to their children. this leads to more curiosity. i would teach this fact to my daughter but what about other parents? teaching sex education would be helpful to children depending on the method of teaching and the one teaching it. teaching sex education in schools should have the scientific facts including the values. sex should be taught to children as a sacred act done by married couples.

sex education should be taught gradually during their high school life. not abruptly so they would understand the consequences and be prepared for the real world

By: sexedusucks

sexedusucks — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:22:26 +0000

i have a debate too about sex education and we’re at the “pro” side. It means we agree on sex education in h.s. but this topic really sucks because many boys in our school have malicious mind already. I ask many people if they are agree or not and many of them answered me with “I’m in the middle”..haha. Well, I’m also anti but as I read all this comments, my point of view change. Maybe sex education will help us. It really depends on who is teaching it. Well, teens will learn it anyway so why not teach them.
i’m anti in the way that sex education contains not good things especially if someone in your class start to make fun of it and everyone will be curious of what that joker is saying and it will affect the clean minds of some student …but again…teens will learn it anyway so why not teach them.

By: raika

raika — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:33:04 +0000

hi..im raika
hmmp..i need your help abwt sex edu must be taught in hihg school curriculum…i need to gather some info abwt sex edu in phil and i dont know where 2 get it….we have debate abwt that and im in affirmative side…could you help me in writing my speech abwt sex education must be taught in highschool curriculum?

By: Pronatalist

Pronatalist — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:08:00 +0000

The big problem with Sex Education, is that too often, it’s proponents or pushers have ulterior wicked motives. Often Sex Ed is a commercial for the false security of shoddy, experimental Big Pharma contraceptive potions and poisons, which then leads to secondary profits for the pro-aborts selling abortions for their shoddy contraceptive “failures.”

Often if there’s a Sex Ed program that conservative parents like, then the pushers of Sex Ed don’t like it, and there’s a big political battle, which that should tell us that it’s an attack against people’s morality, faith, and against their families.

True love waits, or abstinence is best, is too simple a message for today’s wicked “progressives” to accept. They like to complicate it with a sales pitch for promiscuity and nasty contraceptives, to somehow justify their “much learning.”

Another problem with Sex Ed, is that often it’s co-ed, meaning mixed sexes within the class. This is designed to break down natural modesty between the sexes, and promote immoral promiscuity. While some may wish we could be so open about sex, that sex segregating the classes should not be necessary, I’m just not so sure that this is the case?

Author Sam Blumingfeld (spelling?) said when they call it “Ed” or “Education,” it isn’t (education, but propaganda). We don’t have Math Education. It’s just Math. So when you see Ed tacked onto the name of something, it’s suspect as possible propaganda, and not teaching of truth.

Also, Sex Ed is very simple, way too short to be a regular class unto itself. I see it more appropriate perhaps, as just a few pages in a Biology or a Health textbook. And it should be promoting good moral values, such as naturally growing responsible families, not a commercial for immoral sex, promiscuity, or for nasty unnatural anti-life contraceptives.

I see nothing wrong with some children’s dictionary or health book I saw years ago in a bookstore, showing a drawing of the erect penis inside the vagina, and the baby growing in the womb on the next page. Just a natural fact of life, that most all humans reproduce. I didn’t see the book promoting any sexual immorality, and simply explaining how babies are made, seems OK to me.

BTW, the only reason I addressed this comment to you, is because you posted recently.

By: NaomiS

NaomiS — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:35:33 +0000

yes the sex education system sucks, i attended a government school from grades prep-6 and we were taught about the menstrual cycle in grade 5 and that “a man puts his penis inside a women when they love each other” in grade 6 i now attend a catholic secondary school (grade 7-12) and they taught us about the STI’s and to abstain from sex (surprise surprise..) but it was in the lowest detail as possible. i learnt most of the information i know, from my very open mother, from the internet, and from reading many books while i was younger. i often find its me explaining things to my friends to the best i can because no one feels they can teach them. i am also a teenage mum, so i know quite a bit from going along the pregnancy, it wasnt wanted but i couldnt stand the emotional pain of thinking about destroying or giving it away so i kept it. when schools explain about pregnancy they say nothing about birthing or the things that go in your head, confusing alot of people thinking that it will be easy and if its too hard its just so easy to get an abortion. the sex education i received made it sound like it was extremely hard for the sperm, they said there was millions of sperm, but covered that up with “most get killed on the way to the egg, and only ever are a few capable of getting near it”
todays world is nothing but sex, everything advertised is with something that can be put to as sexual (the most common example being the selling of some new car – ‘hot’ girls in g-strings and bras smothering themselves all over the front of it) so instead of teaching abstinence, we need to teach the kids on how to best protect themselves, and to have all their options open to them and to make sure they have the best knowledge available. sure i regret not waiting, but i feel it would have been better if i knew the details of the consequences better. kids need details!

By: whia

whia — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:43:43 +0000

a few words: your children are very lucky to have you
whia´s last blog ..SANTA’s Application for Citizenship Approved!

By: Colina,Jade

Colina,Jade — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:01:20 +0000

Hi,

Well, like you I am also doing a thesis on sex education, I want to know what is your aim in your study in one way or another we could change ideas. I hope to get in touch. thank’s

By: ana

ana — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:12:25 +0000

me too…
i also want to know on how you defended your stand on your debate or how did you oppose sex education? plsss..I hope you could help me too, coz we’re also having a debate on this topic and i find it hard looking for facts that could support the opposition side…plsss….
this is my email-ad…
anamae_m16@yahoo.com

By: rianne

rianne — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:28:26 +0000

I agree for sex education BUT NOT in elementary or primary school. Sex is a very sensitive topic that should be explained with teens like high school students because surely they will understand it already. If you will have sex education in Primary school they might still not understand what the teachers are trying to say and they might take it in a wrong way. In my own opinion we should leave the explanation to the parents atleast for those children or students in primary age.