Lessons Learned From Malu Fernandez

      12 Comments on Lessons Learned From Malu Fernandez

malu fernandez
(Via Annalyn.net)
Tonight at 6:00 PM, Benj with other bloggers and journalists and possibly [tag]Malu Fernandez[/tag] will appear in Media In Focus at the ABS-CBN News Channel Studios. (Media in Focus replays: 11 PM tonight, SAT 6 AM and 5 PM ) I talked to Anton de Leon , a fellow blogger based in Dubai and he admits that:

The reactions from people from all over the globe have been going strong. To this day, i have had reactions come from bloggers and readers who speak vehemently of Miss Malu and the acerbic wit she has pushed. It really has become an angry mob, but who is to blame here. Aside from Malu, i think part of it should be shifted to the people who allowed the commentary to be published. This is why, in this circle of work that i revolve in. we have these things called editors. Editors are supposed to make the call and check for content.

Over 2000 angry comments expressed to date! I can understand their feelings. Feelings are just feelings; there is no morality in the feeling, only in our behavior. We can feel angry without hurting or abusing others or ourselves. The thing is not a lot of people can express their anger appropriately. I too have been guilty in the past of name-calling but I have learned. Anger is an emotion we’re all prone to experience. Yes, it’s okay to feel angry , I agree. It points to a problem. In this case, it signals a problem that needs to be solved. Sometimes , it points to boundaries we need to set. Sometimes , it’s the final burst of energy before letting go, or acceptance settles in.

I would like to believe that this anger should now have a positive resolution. A few bloggers point out the lessons learned from the Malu Fernandez article:

1. From the The Jester in Exile

Finally, there’s this: the power of the cyberspace and the blogosphere’s viral effect, online, and the resulting offline, to influence people and events. There are those who may think that this is a victory of the blogosphere (not that Manolo or Arbet do, as they opine), and such people may be right. I think, however, the blogger with the best take on this is The Nashman, who says:

If people were as angry at the current government who actually does evil things than hunting a paper tiger like Malu then we’d be better off.

2. From Tingog.com

What many fail to understand is that blogging is not isolated, simply because the blogger is not isolated. The blogger is free to email, market, and expand the issue that he is writing about, and thus the act of blogging is no longer the matter of just writing the article, but of spreading the views and opinions written therein.

But let me make another crucial point. A massive amount of energy was used on this issue, not because it was more important, because that in itself can be subjective, the reason was that all other stories were being covered. Mainstream had already been writing about the exchange rate, the war in Basilan, The return of Hello Garci, JPEPA, and so on. What wasn’t on mainstream was this specific issue. And indeed, we can argue, there are many more stories that should be given their just due spotlight in front of a national audience, and that my dear readers is the key as to why this issue is so important. It shows us that we can make it happen.

3. From the The Warrior Lawyer

Thus, while I urge care in imposing any sort of regulation that would impede the spontaneity of the medium, it might now be time to encourage dialogue on the need for an ethics code. With ascendancy should come accountability.

Journalistic codes of ethics (there are quite a number, apparently), the very standards by which Ms. Fernandez was measured and found wanting, seek to ensure fairness, accuracy and transparency. Journalists are expected to show compassion and be sensitive to the sensibilities of those who would be the subjects of their writing. They should show good taste and seek to minimize harm. Would adoption of these ethical standards prejudice bloggers and undermine the democratic character of the blogosphere? I don’t think so.

4. From atheista.net

It must be emphasized that this is the first time that bloggers are being cited as one of the bigger players in this developing story. Have we really gained enough cred to hold enough authority to somehow police the mainstream media by a)whistle-blowing on the incidents of unfair journalism and b)direct them into more news-worthy stories? (the story of Pyro comes to mind) Have we truly arrived as a new and emerging flank of Philippine media or is this a mere fluke? (Edit– Read Benj’s The Post-Mortem: Media In Focus)

5. The Jester in Exile has a reply for number 4.

To marshal the Pinoy blogosphere, we need to establish these things:

  • The issue used must be sufficiently controversial. D-uh.
  • The issue should be polarizing — there are clear sides, “right versus wrong” would be best.
  • The issue must connect on a personal and an emotional level to the digital Filipino (*wink to Janette), as it were.
  • The issue must be such that righteous indignation is spawned, not a sense of “yeah, yeah, same-old, same-old.”
  • The issue must be not be cluttered — one issue on its own would be best — and the issue must be factual or attributable.
  • The issue must be easily picked up and spread — the best demonstration of how viral a single point can be is Noemi.
  • Finally, any action in cyberspace must involve MSM and IRL awareness and action (like what Nick did.)
  • *MSM- Mainstream Media
    *IRL- In Real Life

    The furor is far from over though. Only Manila Standard can decide the fate of this issue.

    We should now move forward and learn from these lessons. Don’t you think so?

    edit– September 1. Added Youtube of the Media in Focus

    Part 1

    View the rest of the videos:

    Part 2
    Part 3
    Part 4
    Part 5
    Part 6

Noemi Lardizabal-Dado (1388 Posts)

You may contact Noemi (noemidado @ gmail.com) for speaking and consultancy services in the following areas: Parenting in the Digital Age (includes pro-active parenting on cyber-bullying and bullying) ; Social Business ; Reinventing One’s Life; and social media engagement. Our parenting workshop is called "Prep to Prime (P2P): Parenting in the Digital Age (An Un­Workshop)" P2P Un­Workshops are conducted by two golden women in their prime, Noemi and Jane, who have a century’s worth of experience between them. They are both accomplished professionals who chose to become homemakers. This 180­degree turn also put them on a different life course which includes blogging, social media engagement and citizen advocacy. They call their un­workshops Prep to Prime or P2P, for short, to emphasize the breadth of their parenting experience. They tackle different aspects and issues of parenting ­­ from managing pregnancies, prepping for the school years of children, dealing with househelp, managing the household budget, to maximizing one’s prime life and staying healthy through the senior years.

  • Well, here is an author that decided to defend ms Malu F.


  • That’s exactly what I told Mitch (mitchteryosa) wrote a post on this whole brouhaha. She happens to be an OFW. I said that the editors at People should also be held liable for allowing this kind of written work grace their pages. And to think I actually buy that magazine.

  • The ANC spin on the issue was a bit weird -a bit anti-blogger. Watch it later. 🙁

  • that this reached tv news is not unexpected. it was a painful article, the apology even more so. some ofw-bloggers are taking it personally, and i cant blame them. im not an ofw yet i got hurt by it.

  • @tech- I guess we can all agree to disagree.

    @kongkong- Boycott!

    @Benj- how sad ! Yet I expected them to be NOT nice.

    @ladycess- I can understand their feelings. And they expressed it in anger. I just hope they can now move on to work something positive out of it.

  • Yay, I just watched it and I think I did well. I could’ve asserted myself more though.

    And oh, I hate the Luddite Lady. Sobrang… ugh. She’s so Republican. LOLOL

  • @benj- you were fantastic. Eloquent and confident. you didn’t look nervous. I like Randy Carandang too. The others were just ho-hum. I can’t believe that Malu described the comments , entries as the “Lynch mob” And the lady publisher was too clueless about the blogging medium. No wonder her replies were like that. Oh well she said it nicely though. Nothing crass about her opinions.

  • Well, the lady was… clueless. Her battle cry was blogging is a ‘sin’. Alex Magno was likewise clueless. They were stuck in this view that the Internet is one united confluence of people. Ack. They were even confused with the difference between a blog and an email message. waaaaaaaaaah.

    Ricky was great! It was a good thing that he was there. I can’t imagine what would’ve happened in the second half of the show if he didn’t walk in from the other studio. Ang galing galing. And he knows my blog (or so he says), that made my day. LoL.

  • WE were all praises for Ricky Carandang. Galing niya. Idol. He was likewise fair to traditional media.

  • lemon

    Pity, I didn’t get to watch this.

    Re”they were even confused with the difference between a blog and an email message.” Are these people for real?LOLOLOL and waaaaah indeed.

  • May replay pa at 6pm and 5pm! 🙂 SATURDAY (BUKAS! TODAY!) haha

  • This goes to show most people haven’t logged in to blogging. Dami … even at my work place — who are clueless.

    But I guess this state of affairs won’t be like this for long. 🙂

    There was really a mob, wasn’t there.